In a thought-provoking video commentary, self-proclaimed social media activist Very Dark Man delves into the Skiibii-Nickie Dabarbie saga, raising questions and speculations surrounding the controversial incident.
Very Dark Man begins by questioning Skiibii’s role and responsibility in inviting Nickie Dabarbie to his house, suggesting potential motives such as discussing music promotion or engaging in “runs” for financial gain, a common practice among influencers.
He speculates that Nickie Dabarbie was likely sober upon arrival at Skiibii’s house, as Skiibii wouldn’t have allowed her entry if she were intoxicated. However, he suggests that she may have been given something to drink that led to her intoxication, insinuating ulterior motives by the men present, possibly with the intent to take advantage of her.
Regarding allegations of money rituals, Very Dark Man dismisses the notion, arguing that Nickie Dabarbie’s presence as the only woman would make her an unlikely target for such schemes. He attributes her injuries to consuming a substance that was too strong for her, possibly laced with drugs.
Addressing Nickie Dabarbie’s claim of being served “dog s**t,” Very Dark Man interprets it as a reference to brownies possibly laced with a potent drug, exacerbating her intoxicated state.
In a bold assertion, Very Dark Man concludes that Skiibii would face legal repercussions if he were to sue Nickie Dabarbie for defamation, as the events occurred within his residence, potentially implicating him in the controversy.
Through his analysis, Very Dark Man presents alternative perspectives and raises doubts about the narrative surrounding the Skiibii-Nickie Dabarbie incident, urging viewers to consider the complexities and potential motivations behind the events that transpired.
